Proposal: "Headless" mode of the AliyunDrive implementation about opendal HOT 6 CLOSED

I plan to submit a PR tomorrow UTC+8. I'm considering refactoring the Writer part of AliyunDrive to fully support the rapid upload, and then I will hitch a ride to add it.

Bravo! Our integration tests failed for #4657, maybe you also want to take a look 🙏

from opendal.

Awesome! Thank you so much!

from opendal.

Seems we can add access_token in config

from opendal.

I agree with you. I overlooked the client side and prefer to delegate the token generation part to the lib. However, it's crucial to keep the secret confidential for client apps.

IMO, all we need is an extra access_token. Users can configure it with either an access_token or a set of refresh_token, client_id, and client_secret. headless is abrupt, just throw it away : )

from opendal.

thanks for your inputs!

Do you prefer me or yourself to do this? @yuchanns

from opendal.

I plan to submit a PR tomorrow UTC+8. I'm considering refactoring the Writer part of AliyunDrive to fully support the rapid upload, and then I will hitch a ride to add it.

from opendal.