Please test new timestamp-sorting code about org-rifle HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks for the update. I must admit helm-org-rifle has never made it into my regular workflow, but I started revisiting it about 2 weeks ago. I currently have helm-org-rifle-20160420.818 installed from ELPA and I have only been using vanilla M-x helm-org-rifle.

What's the passing criteria of this test, or is this for UX feedback? If I were to replace the old version with the latest update today, unless there was something drastic, I very likely can't tell the difference.

from org-rifle.

@whacked No problem, I appreciate your checking in anyway. :) The version you have installed is pretty old by now.

Yes, I'm looking for general feedback and testing. The new helm-org-rifle-occur commands operate differently, showing results in a persistent buffer instead of a Helm buffer. Seems to be working well, so I went ahead and pushed it to master, but I'd appreciate any feedback you may have.

The timestamp-sorting branch (not yet in master or MELPA) lets you run the commands with a universal prefix and choose a sorting method. I think it's working fine, but since it has some significant changes in the code, I'd like to get a little feedback from someone else before I push it out as a stable version.

from org-rifle.

thx @alphapapa

I in contrast to @whacked use org rifle daily 😁

I had a crazy busy week but if its pushed to MELPA i will try it this week and report back ASAP

thx again for this awesome package ;-)

z

from org-rifle.

I pushed the branch to master, so I'll go ahead and close this, but please let me know if you have any feedback. :)

from org-rifle.