Suggestion for CJAX 6.0 about cjax HOT 2 CLOSED

Hi HalloofFamer,

Thank You very much for your suggestions!, I will comment on each one of your points below.

1. Using namespaces is a great idea, however the usage of it, of better said - the purpose of it is to avoid conflicting name conventions, Cjax's code is very lightweight and relative small (not a whole lot of classes), hence rendering that addition needless at the moment. I would absolutely do that in a huge size project with characteristics that name conventions ambiguity are likely to happen on class name conventions. Don't know further down the road, but as of this moment, there are no plans to re-write Cjax using namespaces.
2. You are right, this absolutely deserves some attention, and it is the direction it needs to go.
3. This goes hand and hand with mouse events, and also can be looked into further.

Yes it is very feasible!

Again, thank you for your suggestions, and they will be taken into consideration. Feel free to make any more suggestions at any time.

from cjax.

Thanks for your reply, I am glad you like the idea I proposed. So have you thought about the suggestions I made, and if I may ask, when do you plan to work on the next version of CJAX?

from cjax.