netlist parser should be able to handle model parameters provided after circuit about ahkab HOT 5 CLOSED

See also:

http://newton.ex.ac.uk/teaching/CDHW/Electronics2/userguide/sec2.html#2.3

from ahkab.

Hi!

You are correct. The main issue is that the syntax is slightly different. Not much but enough to make it incompatible with a SPICE netlist, which is rather stupid. This is something I would like to address.

The syntax is:

.model diode model_id [IS= N= ISR= NR= RS= CJ0= M= VJ= FC= CP= TT= BV= IBV= KF= AF= FFE= TEMP= XTI= EG= TBV= TRS= TTT1= TTT2= TM1= TM2=]

so that the line above would be:

.model diode dx is=1e-13 kf=1e-30

The diode code has also been changed very recently and it didn't get much testing, if you find any other problem please report it! :)

edit: grammar
edit model_id was enclosed in '>' and hidden

from ahkab.

So the aforementioned SPICE3 site quoth thus:

 .MODEL MNAME TYPE(PNAME1=PVAL1 PNAME2=PVAL2 ... )

Would a patch to modify netlist_parser to conform with the SPICE3 standard (with parens) be accepted?

from ahkab.

Yes!

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Ian Daniher [email protected]:

So the aforementioned SPICE3 site quoth thus:

.MODEL MNAME TYPE(PNAME1=PVAL1 PNAME2=PVAL2 ... )

Would a patch to modify netlist_parser to conform with the SPICE3
standard (with parens) be accepted?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2#issuecomment-23371838
.

from ahkab.

41ff065 seems to do the job.

from ahkab.